Invest KOREA

韩联网消息: 韩联社首尔12月23日电 据韩国文化体育观光部23日展望,今年访韩外国游客有望超过1870万人次,创历史新高。 访韩外国游客在新冠疫情暴发前的2019年创下最高纪录,为1750万人次。数据显示,今年中国游客依然稳居游客来源国榜首,尤其是7—8月,中国游客规模大增。文体部表示,这归功于加大面向20至49岁年龄段女性的宣传力度,积极推广团体旅游和大学生游学产品。 来自台湾的游客同比增长27%,刷新历史纪录;来自日本的游客同样创2012年以来的最高纪录,达361万人次;来自亚洲和中东地区的游客同比增长11.8%;来自欧美和大洋洲的游客规模增长14%。 文体部为纪念外国游客规模创纪录,当天在仁川机场第二航站楼面向今年入境的第1850万个游客举行了欢迎仪式。 zhanglili456@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2025.12.23.

韩联网消息: 韩联社1首尔2月22日电 据韩国财界22日消息,三星电子会长李在镕、SK集团会长崔泰源、现代汽车集团会长郑义宣、LG集团会长具光谟等韩国四大集团掌门人很可能于明年年初作为经济使节团成员出访中国。 此次经济使节团由大韩商工会议所(韩国商会)牵头组建,计划组织约200家企业代表访华,目前正接受企业报名申请。报名将于23日截止,经审核后正式确定使节团名单。具体行程、成员名单可能受韩中首脑会谈成行与否等影响。 使节团将由兼任韩国商会会长的崔泰源率领。他曾于今年10月访华,就亚太经合组织(APEC)工商领导人峰会成功举办、扩大韩中经济合作等事宜与中方进行磋商。 据悉,使节团访华期间将参加韩中商务论坛、签署经济合作谅解备忘录(MOU)、一对一商务洽谈会等活动。在商务论坛上,双方将围绕制造业创新与供应链、消费品新市场以及服务和内容产业等领域,探讨深化两国经济合作的方案。大韩贸易投资振兴公社(KOTRA)也将为有意进军中国市场的企业安排一对一商务洽谈活动。 另值得一提的是,这是自2019年12月前总统文在寅访华出席第八次韩中日领导人会议以来,大韩商工会议所时隔6年再次组织经济使节团访华。当时,包括时任大韩商工会议所会长朴容晩在内,三星电子副会长尹富根、现代汽车社长孔泳云等100余名主要企业高管陪同出访。 lizhengyun@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2025.12.22.

韩联网消息: 韩联社首尔12月14日电 韩国海洋水产部(海水部)14日表示,美国自上月13日(以通关日为准)起对韩产调味紫菜实施零关税。 据海水部介绍,美国白宫上月发布关于对等关税的“情况说明书”(Fact Sheet),将韩产调味紫菜列为零关税品目,美国此前对其征收15%的对等关税。由此,调味紫菜成为唯一获得美国关税豁免的韩国主力出口食品,而美国对韩产干紫菜的关税维持原先的15%。 虽然美国政府今年对韩征收对等关税,但今年1月至11月韩国对美紫菜出口额同比增加15.9%,为2.28亿美元。单看11月,对美紫菜出口额同比增加25.2%,为2450万美元,11月出口额增幅高于今年前11个月的累计增幅。美国市场在韩国紫菜出口额中占比超过二成,调味紫菜在对美紫菜出口额中占比超过九成。海水部相关人士认为,调味紫菜关税豁免预计将对扩大韩国紫菜对美出口产生积极影响。 kchy515@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2025.12.14.

韩联网消息: 韩联社世宗12月19日电 据东盟与韩中日宏观经济研究办公室(AMRO)19日发布的一份报告,在居民消费回升和出口强劲的推动下,韩国今年和明年的实际国内生产总值(GDP)有望分别增加1%和1.9%。 AMRO预测韩国今年的通胀率为2.1%,明年将下降到1.9%。AMRO认为,虽然韩元兑美元汇率下降,但是对外领域表现依然亮眼。去年韩国经常项目收支顺差占GDP的比重为5.3%,而今年前三季度已增至6.1%,这得力于全球AI产业迅猛发展,带动半导体出口增长。韩国外汇储备为短期外债的2.6倍,为潜在冲击发挥缓冲作用。 AMRO指出,韩国政府楼市管控措施对缓解房价上升压力发挥了作用,但是包括投机地区在内的楼市要实现稳定尚需时日。AMRO还就韩国银行(央行)5月以来冻息措施评价称,央行货币政策基调妥当,但首尔楼市价格涨势及韩元兑美元汇率走势仍需密切关注。 AMRO还表示,加强生产行业韧性和解决人口结构问题是保持可持续发展的必要条件,并建议保障家庭和工作平衡,扩大经济活动参与度,延迟退休年龄。 yongjoo29@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2025.12.19.

Yes, in this case a permission for change of use to a higher group pursuant to Article 19 2 of the Building Act should be obtained. Under the first sentence of Article 21 3 of the Special Act on the Promotion of Venture Businesses and Article 14 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, it is stipulated that notwithstanding Article 76 1 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and Article 36 1 of the Special Act on Promotion of Special Research and Development Zones, a person who has moved within the facilities for clustering venture businesses may establish an urban-type factory with a factory construction area of not more than 2,000 m2 among urban-type factories under subparagraph 1 of Article 34 of the Enforcement Decree of the Industrial Cluster Development and Factory Establishment Act to the extent that the structural safety is not threatened. On the other hand, Article 19 1 of the Building Act stipulates that any change in the use of a building shall be made in compliance with the building code for the changed use, and paragraph 2 1 of the same Article prescribes that any person who intends to change the use of a building approved to use shall obtain permission to change the use of a building falling under the groups of facilities classified in the subparagraphs of paragraph 4 of the same Article to any group higher than the group. Also, under Article 14 5 2 c of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act which prescribes the groups of facilities, factories fall under groups of facilities for industrial purpose, etc., while subparagraph 6 b of the same paragraph classifies education and research facilities as groups of facilities for education and welfare. Therefore, when intending to change the use of the building falling under facilities for education and welfare to the use of factories classified as groups of facilities for industrial purpose, etc., a permission for change of use pursuant to Article 19 2 of the Building Act should be obtained in principle because it is a change of use to a group higher than the group. Because Article 21 3 of the Special Act on the Promotion of Venture Businesses excludes the application of the regulation restricting change of use based on building code pursuant to Article 19 1, not Article 19 as a whole, and Article 19 2 of the said Act states that a person intending the change of use of a building should obtain permission or file a report, and prescribes the persons subject to permission or report of change of use and the procedures to obtain permission or file a report. In other words, because the contents of paragraphs 1 and 2 of the same Article are clearly different, Article 21 3 of the Special Act on the Promotion of Venture Businesses can be deemed a regulation that exceptionally permits change of use within the facilities for clustering venture businesses notwithstanding the restrictions on change of use of a building pursuant to Article 19 1 of the Building Act, but it is difficult to consider this as a regulation that grants exemption of the permission or report process for change of use under paragraph 2 of the same Article. In addition, when a law prescribes regulations on certain principles and then stipulates regulations providing exceptions to such principles, the exceptions should not be exaggerated in interpretation and the interpretation should be stricter. However, Article 21 3 of the Special Act on the Promotion of Venture Businesses should be strictly interpreted as an exception to the principles of change of use under Article 19 1 of the Building Act prescribing that any change of the use of a building shall be made in compliance with the building code for the changed use, and the interpretation that the regulations on the persons subject to permission and report and the permission and report process shall be subject to exception in the same way as paragraph 1 of the same Article shall be considered an excessive extension of the regulations on special cases on a person who has moved within the facilities for clustering venture businesses in accordance with the Building Act, and therefore not considered appropriate. Therefore, in this case, a permission for change of use to a higher group pursuant to Article 19 2 of the Building Act should be obtained.

외국인투자 촉진법 시행규칙 [별지 제3호서식] <개정 2025. 10. 1.> 주식등의 취득 또는 출연 방식에 의한 외국인투자내용 변경 [ ]신고서 [ ]허가신청서 ※ 바탕색이 어...

외국인투자 촉진법 시행규칙 [별지 제3호서식] <개정 2025. 10. 1.> 주식등의 취득 또는 출연 방식에 의한 외국인투자내용 변경 [ ]신고서 [ ]허가신청서 ※ 바탕색이 어...