Invest KOREA

韩联网消息: 韩联社首尔3月6日电 韩国银行(央行)6日发布的初步核实数据显示,韩国今年1月国际收支经常项目实现132.6亿美元顺差,创下历年单月第五高,连续33个月保持顺差。 具体来看,1月货物贸易顺差151.7亿美元,约为去年同期的4.5倍,出口额为655.1亿美元,同比大增30%。这得益于半导体等IT品目出口持续向好,加上1月开工天数较同期增加。以海关数据为准,半导体(102.5%)、无线通信设备(89.7%、电脑周边产品(82.4%)、乘用车(19%)等增加,面向东南亚地区(59.9%)、中国(46.8%)、美国(29.4%)等地的出口增加。同期,进口为503.4亿美元,同比增长7%。其中原材料进口减少0.3%,资本货物增加21.6%,消费品大增27.4%。 此外,服务贸易收支出现38亿美元逆差,逆差规模同比(-23.5亿美元)和环比(-36.9亿美元)均扩大。其中,旅游收支出现17.4亿美元逆差。 反映工资、分红、利息等的国际收支初次收入账户收支实现27.2亿美元顺差。韩国对外直接投资增加70.4亿美元,外国对韩直接投资增加53.4亿美元。韩国对外证券投资增加134.6亿美元,外国对韩证券投资增加46.9亿美元。 zhanglili456@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2026.03.06.

韩联网消息: 泰安=韩联网忠南和泰安郡6日在新加坡当地,同亚洲、太平洋最大的再生能源开发、运营民间事业企业--VENA集团签订1万亿韩元规模的投资协约。 VENA集团与哥本哈根基础设施合作伙伴Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners:CIP一起在泰安郡近兴面贾谊岛里北边11公里的海上,正在建设500MW规模的海上风力发电园区。 在上述海上风力发电园区,预备生产可提供给30万 户人家的年1.678TWh以上的电力,同时每年还能减少74万吨以上的温室气体。 VENA集团为此,计划截至2030年投资1万亿韩元。 泰安郡凭借本次招商引资,期待能为地方经济增添活力,并希望本次投资能成为创出岗位等实际性经济发展动力。 郡某有关人士表示说:“与忠南道政府将支持所有行政力量,以让上述项目能顺利落实。” cobra@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2026.03.06. ~~此记事原文为韩国语电子版~~

In this case, the project implementer has to hold a presentation in city A. Under Article 25 1 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act hereafter “the Act”, it is prescribed that a project implementer shall formulate a draft environmental impact assessment report and gather consensus thereon from residents, etc. And under paragraph 6 of the same Article, it is stated that matters necessary for the methods for preparing draft environmental impact assessment reports made under paragraph 1 shall be prescribed by Presidential Decree. Also, in accordance with Article 39 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act, if a “project zone subject to environmental impact assessment” straddles at least 2 Si/Gun/Gus, the relevant project implementer shall hold a presentation at each Si/Gun/Gu respectively. In this regard, if the area involved in the project subject to environmental impact assessment does not straddle two or more Si/Gun/Gus, it will be consistent with the ordinary meeting of the wording to interpret that the project implementer shall hold a presentation only in the relevant Si/Gun/Gu where the project subject to environmental impact assessment is implemented. In addition, strategic environmental impact assessment is conducted when intending to establish a plan on an urban development project or a plan for the development of an industrial site or industrial complex pursuant to Article 9 1 of the Act, and according to Article 11 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act, each draft strategic environmental impact assessment shall include matters such as an overview of the master development plan and the area subject to strategic environmental impact assessment. On the other hand, pursuant to Article 22 1 of the Act, an environmental impact assessment is conducted when intending to implement an urban development project, a plan to develop an industrial site or industrial complex, etc. and Article 34 1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act prescribes that a draft environmental impact assessment report shall include an overview of the project subparagraph 2, the extent of an area affected by each item of assessment by the implementation of the project subject to environmental impact assessment and the present environment condition of its environs subparagraph 3. As such, the two types of assessments are conducted when establishing and implementing a “plan” or a “project”, respectively that impacts the environment, and the two assessments are different in nature and the content of their report. Also, in terms of the audience of the presentation, the strategic environmental impact assessment targets “the area subject to assessment” while the environmental impact assessment targets “the project subject to assessment”. Therefore, it should be considered that the area subject to presentation on environmental impact assessment pursuant to the regulations of the Act is different from the area subject to presentation on strategic environmental impact assessment. Also, administrative laws that form a ground for burdening administrative acts should be strictly interpreted and applied, and their interpretation should not be extensive or analogous in a way that is disadvantageous to the recipient of the administrative act. In this regard, when a project subject to environmental impact assessment does not straddle two or more Si/Gun/Gus, obligating an additional presentation at another Si/Gun/Gu just because it is adjacent to the Si/Gun/Gu where the project subject to environmental impact assessment is to be conducted shall be deemed an interpretation that applies an obligation that is not prescribed by relevant laws, and is an extensive interpretation without explicit regulations or reasonable ground, and is therefore not deemed appropriate. In conclusion, in this case, the project implementer can only hold a presentation in city A.

Yes, two or more individuals may register a tourism accommodation business pursuant to Article 4 1 of the Tourism Promotion Act as joint business operators and obtain approval of business plan as prescribed by Article 15 1 of the same Act. Under Article 4 1 of the Tourism Promotion Act, it is regulated that a person who intends to engage in tourism accommodation business, etc. shall file for registration of such business with the relevant city mayor or provincial governor, etc. In addition, paragraph 5 of the Act stipulates that the matters necessary for procedures for the registration of tourism accommodation shall be prescribed by Ministerial Decree of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Also, Article 2 1 of the Enforcement Rules of the same Act states that persons intending to register a tourism accommodation business shall submit an application for tourism business and a business plan, document certifying the ownership or real estate or right to use real estate to the city mayor or provincial governor and does not state otherwise, such as mandating that a single person should be the business operator when registering a tourism accommodation business or prohibiting the registration of two or more individuals as joint business operators. And under Article 7 of the Tourism Promotion Act, which regulates the grounds for disqualification for registration as a tourism business, personnel requirements such as “the number of business operators” are not prescribed as a ground for disqualification or registration, and Article 2 of the Enforcement Rules of the same Act mandates that individuals intending to register a tourism accommodation business shall submit a business plan, and the name and resident registration number and a document certifying the ownership of real estate if the applicant is a domestic resident, but does not restrict the requirements for business operators or the number of business operators for registering a tourism accommodation business. Furthermore, the purpose of the Tourism Promotion Act is to create an environment favorable to tourism, develop resources for tourism, and foster the tourism industry, and therefore allowing two or more joint business operators in the tourism accommodation business shall lead to attraction of investment and give way for diverse business operation methods, making it align with the legislative purpose of the Tourism Promotion Act. Considering such points, it shall be appropriate to deem that two or more individuals can be joint business operators in the tourism accommodation business pursuant to the Tourism Promotion Act and such joint business operators can register a tourism accommodation business and obtain approval of business plan. Moreover, when starting a new business, business registration is generally required pursuant to Article 168 of the Income Tax Act, and the fact that the Income Tax Act recognizes joint business operators in principle, as seen in the prescription of joint businesses in Article 2-2 Scope of Tax Liability and Article 43 Special Cases concerning Calculation of Joint Business Income of the Act, should be considered as well. In conclusion, it can be said that two or more individuals can become joint business operators and register a tourism accommodation business and obtain approval of business plan in accordance with Article 15 1 of the Tourism Promotion Act.

韩联网消息: 韩联社首尔3月4日电 韩国—菲律宾商务论坛4日(当地时间)在菲律宾首都马尼拉举行,两国签署了涉及造船、核电、消费品等领域的7份合作谅解备忘录。 两国借韩国总统李在明对菲进行国事访问,并同菲律宾总统费迪南德·罗慕尔德兹·马科斯举行会谈之机举行此次论坛,两位总统当天共同出席了活动。 两国借此签署了7份谅解备忘录。具体来看,韩国水电与核电公司、韩国进出口银行与菲律宾马尼拉电力公司签署核电合作谅解备忘录。韩国造船巨头HD现代重工业和菲律宾职业技术教育与技能发展署(TESDA)签署谅解备忘录,商定携手培养造船人才并展开技术合作。 另据产业通商部介绍,两国当天还举行“韩菲商务伙伴关系”活动。韩国食品、美容和医疗保健企业等共52家企业,以及菲方共70家客商参加,进行对接洽谈。韩方在活动上与菲方共签订11份出口合同,合同总金额达1640万美元。 kchy515@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2026.03.04.