Invest KOREA

韩联网消息: 仁川=韩联网据仁川经济自由区厅2日报道,今年已经超过外商直接投资实绩目标值。 据统计,今年松岛、永宗、青萝等仁川经济自由区的FDI累计申报额以10月末为准达到7.4亿美元,超过年目标值6亿美元。 今年仁川经济自由区的FDI累计落实额为5.8亿美元,远远超过目标额3.5亿美元。 今年从仁川经济自由区内各企业FDI实绩来看,生物企业Sartorius 2.5亿美元;半导体后工程企业安靠科技1.8亿美元;海上风力发电企业沃旭能源1.2亿美元等。 但,仁川经济厅考虑到招商引资剩余地皮剩下不多,据此将明年FDI的申报目标值设定为与今年一样的6亿美元暂定。 仁川经济自由区某有关人士表示,将详细了解今后情况,然后在明年确定目标值。 hong@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2025.12.02. ~~此记事原文为韩国语电子版~~

韩联网消息: 首尔=韩联网据中小风险企业部3日透露,明年中小企业研发预算编入历代最大规模即2.2亿韩元。 明年中小企业的预算和基金运营计划总支出规模将比今年预算增加8.4%,即为165,233亿韩元。 其中,去年政府大幅度缩小的中小企业研发按预算决定为21,959亿韩元,超过历年水平,创下新高。 中小企业部决定用这些钱集中投资研发,从而带动中小企业的技术创新和技术主导型增长。 旨在强化中小企业增长阶梯的智能工厂普及预算为4,021亿韩元,与今年相比,大幅度增加。 系统性支持中小企业挑战中坚企业的“JUMP UP项目”预算是今年的两倍水平,即为578亿韩元。 为综合支持K-美容及战略产品的出口市场的多边化,新准备了30亿韩元的K-美容集群发展预算,同时出口联盟预算也增加到198亿韩元。 研发扩大主旨延续到风险、初创企业领域。 旨在培育人工智能、深科技初创企业的母基金预算比今年增加3,200亿韩元,定为8,200亿韩元。 另外,明年将重新推进“独角兽架桥Unicorn Bridge”项目,以支持潜力科技初创企业发展成世界市场的独角兽。 配定预算320亿韩元,支持初创企业的技术高度化和项目化资金、成立海外法人等。 此外,还增加了帮助创业初期企业基于技术发展的创业套餐1,952亿韩元;支持新产业初创企业的革新成长和支持落户世界市场的“超差距初创企业1000”1,456亿韩元等预算。 与大、中坚企业合作,构成智能工厂的共存型智能工厂的预算扩大至400亿韩元。 中小企业部长官韩圣淑表示说:“为小工商人的快速恢复和中小、风险、初创企业的未来挑战,年内迅速制定项目计划,以实现周密的政策支持。另外,明年将无差池地执行预算。” pseudojm@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2025.12.03. ~~此记事原文为韩国语电子版~~

韩联网消息: 首尔=韩联网据大韩贸易投资振兴公社KOTRA今后将提供汇集国内外物流信息的平台。 据KOTRA3日报道,从4日起正式对外开放国内外物流信息综合服务“Haedream出口物流综合信息”。 相关信息将通过KOTRA运营的泛政府海外开拓信息综合平台“海外经济信息Dream”来提供的。 通过这一平台,可以在一个地方确认到运输、各国共同物流中心、运输代理企业、海关/通关动向、贸易保险信息等15个项目。 据KOTRA说明,随着乌克兰战争、苏伊士运河封锁等地政学上的危机和美国掀起的高关税政策、K-消费材料出口的扩大等,出口物流企业的关心和困难事宜不断壮大,据此决定集中、提供分散在公共、民间的物流相关信息。 changyong@yna.co.kr <著作权c属于韩联网,禁止非法转载、转发。> 原文记事 来源:韩联网2025.12.03. ~~此记事原文为韩国语电子版~~

Yes. In this case, the surviving company should obtain permission for wastes treatment business pursuant to Article 25 3 of the Wastes Control Act in order to continue to operate a wastes treatment business. If the text of an Act is composed of relatively clear definitions, it can be said that a different interpretation method is unnecessary or should be used restrictively, in principle. And the first sentence of Article 33 2 of the Wastes Control Act prescribes that "Where a wastes treatment business entity, etc. who is a corporation is merged by absorption with another corporation, establishes a new corporation after the merger with another corporation, or establishes a new corporation or is merged with another corporation after the division of waste treatment business, etc., a corporation surviving the merger or a corporation established by merger or division shall obtain permission from the Minister of Environment or the Mayor/Do Governor, as prescribed by Ministerial Decree of Environment." In the second sentence of the same subparagraph, it is stated that "In such cases, the corporation surviving the merger or the corporation established by merger or division that obtained such permission shall succeed to the rights and obligations relating to permission for, approval of, registration of, or reporting on wastes treatment business, etc." Under subparagraph 8 of the same Article, "where the succession to rights and obligations is made under paragraph 1 or 2, the permission, approval, registration, or report regarding the previous wastes treatment business entity, etc. shall lose its effect" main sentence. In this regard, where a wastes treatment business entity obtained permission for division pursuant to the first sentence of subparagraph 2 of the same Article, the newly incorporated company by division shall succeed to the rights and obligations relating to permission for, etc. waste treatment business, etc. pursuant to the second sentence of the same subparagraph and the main sentence of subparagraph 8 of the same Article, and where such rights and obligations are succeeded, the previous permission, etc. of waste treatment business entities, etc. shall lose its effect, and the surviving corporation is no longer deemed to possess a permission for valid wastes treatment business. Therefore, it shall be conforming to the texts of the Wastes Control Act to interpret that in order for a surviving corporation to continue to operate a wastes treatment business, permission for wastes treatment business prescribed by Article 25 3 of the same Act should be obtained once again. On the other hand, under Article 530-10 of the Commercial Act, a newly incorporated company by simple division, succeeding company after division, etc. shall assume the rights and obligations of the divided company as prescribed by a division plan. In this regard, if it is decided under the division plan that the surviving company and the newly incorporated company by division shall divide sections and both companies shall continue to operate a wastes treatment business, the newly incorporated company by division shall succeed the divided company’s rights and obligations within the scope prescribed by the division plan. In this regard, there can be arguments that the surviving company does not need to re-obtain permission for wastes treatment business under Article 25 3 of the Wastes Control Act and can continue to operate such business. However, the purpose of the Commercial Act is to maintain and strengthen companies and guarantee corporate activities for-profit activities and therefore contribute to national economy, and the Act is a private law based on private autonomy. On the other hand, the Wastes Control Act is a public law based on publicity, the purpose of which is to contribute to enhancing the quality of people’s lives by restricting the emission of wastes and treating wastes in an eco-friendly manner. Because the two laws are separate independent laws with different basic concepts, the Commercial Act cannot apply preferentially over the Wastes Control Act and nor can the application of the Wastes Control Act be exempted without prescribed regulations, so such argument is not valid. Consequently, in this case, the surviving company should obtain permission for division of wastes treatment business pursuant to Article 25 3 of the Wastes Control Act in order to continue to operate a wastes treatment business.

Yes, an employee who had a child who was older than 8 years or in 3rd grade or higher in elementary school at the time of the enforcement of the amended Act, the employee can include two times the unused childcare leave period in the period of reduction of working hours during the childcare period pursuant to the proviso of Article 19-2 4 of the Act. According to Articles 19-2 1 and 4 of the Act before partial amendment to Act no. 20521 on Oct. 22, 2024, an employee’s child had to be “aged 8 years or younger or in the 2nd grade or lower of elementary school” to be eligible to apply for reduction of working hours during the childcare period, which was identical to that of employees eligible to apply for childcare leave, and the period that can be included in the reduction of working hours during childcare leave was as follows: “where an employee who is eligible to apply for childcare leave pursuant to Article 19 1 has not fully used such leave for a period of childcare leave under Article 19 2, the remaining period shall be added to the period for reduction of working hours”. However, under the amended Act, the age range of the child was widened, stipulating that an employee’s child shall be “aged 12 years or younger or in the 6th grade or lower of elementary school” to be eligible to apply for reduction of working hours. The amended Act also stipulates that where an employee has not fully used the childcare leave, two times the remaining period shall be added to the period for reduction of working hours. Therefore, in this case, the issue is whether an employee who has had a child who was older than 8 years or higher than the 2nd grade of elementary school at the time of the enforcement of the amended Act is eligible for addition of two times the remaining period of unused childcare leave period to the period for reduction of working hours. The main sentence of Article 19-2 4 of the amended Act prescribes that the period of reduction of working hours during childcare period is not more than 1 year, while the proviso of the same subparagraph states that where an employee has not fully used childcare leave, two times the remaining period shall be added to the period for reduction of working hours. In other words, because there is no separate clause restricting the relevant regulation to employees who can apply for childcare leave or excluding the employees who cannot apply for childcare leave, it can be said that regardless of whether an employee can apply for childcare leave pursuant to the proviso of Article 19-2 4 of the amended Act, where an employee has a child who is aged 12 or under or in the 6th grade or below of elementary school, he/she is eligible for application of reduction of working hours during childcare leave, and if he/she has not fully used the childcare leave, two times the remaining period can be added to the reduction of working hours during the childcare period. Therefore, if an employee had a child who was older than 8 years or in 3rd grade or higher in elementary school at the time of the enforcement of the amended Act, the employee can include two times the unused childcare leave period in the period of reduction of working hours during the childcare period pursuant to the proviso of Article 19-2 4 of the Act.

외국인투자 촉진법 시행규칙 [별지 제3호서식] <개정 2025. 10. 1.> 주식등의 취득 또는 출연 방식에 의한 외국인투자내용 변경 [ ]신고서 [ ]허가신청서 ※ 바탕색이 어...

외국인투자 촉진법 시행규칙 [별지 제3호서식] <개정 2025. 10. 1.> 주식등의 취득 또는 출연 방식에 의한 외국인투자내용 변경 [ ]신고서 [ ]허가신청서 ※ 바탕색이 어...

외국인투자 촉진법 시행규칙 [별지 제3호서식] <개정 2025. 10. 1.> 주식등의 취득 또는 출연 방식에 의한 외국인투자내용 변경 [ ]신고서 [ ]허가신청서 ※ 바탕색이 어...

■ 외국인투자 촉진법 시행규칙 [별지 제1호서식] <개정 2025. 10. 1.> 주식등의 취득 또는 출연 방식에 의한 외국인투자 [ ]신고서 [ ]허가신청서 ※ 바탕색이 어두운 ...